go back button
Angel Francisco Martinez
By
November 29, 2018

Why carry out a soil-structure interaction analysis in very soft soil?

SUMMARY

The objective of the webinar is to compare the use of 3D solid soil elements vs 1D soil springs,for soil structure interaction analysis, to establish the differences between these approaches. The models compare a 7-story building with slab foundation that rests on very soft soil by Indirect (traditional) and Direct SSI methods. The first model represents the ground

with Winkler spring elements,while in the second represents the ground with 3D solid FEM elements that consider the soil’s short- and long-term nonlinear behavior. The results show that traditional methods significantly underestimate soil rigidity, producing almost half of the differential settlements than those obtained when modeling the ground as 3D solids.

 

 

 

 

model-img

 

R E S E A R C H E R

Luis-Alberto Cruz-López,
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana

 

 

 

 

 

K E Y   P O I N T S

1. Comparison of Soil Structure Interaction by the Indirect and Direct Methods.

2. Benefits of using 3D elements with constitutive soil models that consider the hardening-soft-soil behavior during settlement.

3. Benefits of using an integrated model where the subsoil and building are modeled together.

4. Limitations / problems with Winkler spring elements for modeling soft ground.

5. It is important to compare the mechanical elements and their displacements with both methods to evaluate the change in the final structural design of the building.

 

 

 pdf-download-button-gts_nx

 

start-model-button-gts_nx

 

  


 

 speaker-icon1

Speaker :  Angel Francisco Martinez

Category : Geotechnical

Software : midas GTS NX

Date : 2018-11-28

 


 



 

 

Search Keyword search-icon

      Subscribe

      Popular Tags

      midas GTS NX Tunnel MIDAS Academics Research Paper Foundation Dam Underground Excavation 3D Wall Construction Consolidation Soil Structure Interaction 2D Pile Construction Stage 3D FEM midas GTS numerical analysis Seepage Dynamic Slope Embankment Ground Rail Seismic Spalling groundwater midas Gen pressure settlements 3D modelling Alpine Base Tunnels Analysis of Finite Element Methode Bridge Combined Pile-Raft Foundations Complex Concrete Couple Analysis Coupled Analysis Culvert DDM Design Design analysis Displacement Diversion Tunnel Double shield TBMs El Nino Elastic modulus Excavating Finite Element Foundation Differential Settlements Fracod Geometry Geostatic High-rise building Highly Expansive Hoek-Brown criterion Intersection Live Load Analysis Long Drought Season Long deep tunnels Monte Carlo ONKALO Parametric study Progressive Failure Purdue Q-z curve Raft Foundations Safety Factor Shrinkage Simultaneous Blasting Soil Soil Modeling Spalling prediction Squeezing Structural Analysis Structural Design Substructure T-z curves Thermal Analysis Vertical stress Void Creation alluvial anisotropic properties axial shear stresses barrette raft base buoyancy phenomenon numerically collapse compact crystalline rock deepening elasticity embedded pile element finite element method foundation design fractured zone geological investigation geomechanical parameter geophysics ground resistance hydraulic behavior instrumentation junction limestone cavity linear-elastic ground load transfer curves load transfer mechanism mechanism non linear analysis numerical analysis of pile group numerical method numerous large pile systems o-cell loading packer permeability testing pile group pile loading portal pressuremeter testing rail tunnel seismic loading sensitivity analysis shaft shallow depths spillways standard penetration testing stress and strain subsea